Accountability / Leadership Record
What leadership committed to & what happened
The 30-second version
1written commitment overdue
- An audit of 2020 was promised in 2021 and has not appeared.
- The Board's promise queue is open and filled as promises are made.
- Every entry needs a date, exact words and a source.
Scoreboard
Counts from the tracker below. Updated as sourced records are added.
0Commitments kept
2Partly kept
1Overdue, no update
1Evidence pending
Counts of officials' answers, promises and positions appear here, computed from the records below.
How follow-through is measured
1. Promise status
- Kept Done, with proof
- Partly kept Some of it done
- Overdue Past due, no update
- Changed Altered without a stated reason
- Pending Not yet due, or evidence being gathered
2. Answer quality
Each answer to a member's question gets a score from 0 to 4, using the rubric below. The average shows whether questions are being answered.
3. Moving targets
Each time a fundraising goal changes, it is logged with the old figure, the new figure, the date and whether a written reason was given. A change with no reason counts against follow-through.
| Score | What the answer looks like | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Direct answer with figures or a document | "Headquarters' shortfall was covered by general reserves; here is the transfer on page 12." |
| 3 | Direct answer without a supporting document, or a partial answer with a specific date | "Part of it was reserves. We will publish the full breakdown by March 1." |
| 2 | Deferred ("we'll discuss it later", including "at the town hall"); re-scored once the follow-up happens | "We'll look into it and get back to you." |
| 1 | Deflection, or answers a different question than the one asked | "It's all in the annual report," when the report does not contain it. |
| 0 | No answer, or the question is dismissed | No reply, or the person asking is belittled. |
Statements that are not answers to a question are recorded as positions on the record, not scored.
Commitment tracker
Commitments ADAMS made in writing or in public, each with its source and status, are listed on the Promises tab.
Counts by status appear here when the page's scripts have loaded.
Board of Trustees promise queue
The Board "sets vision, ensures accountability, and guides ADAMS' growth."E1 This queue records promises made by the Board or by individual trustees in that role, and tracks each one to completion.
Current Board of Trustees
As listed on ADAMS's team page on Oct 12, 2026. The page lists 13 trustees without officer titles.
Ali Altalib · Amir Sahib · Asma Saqib · Aysha Chishty · Bilal Zaman · Firas Barzinji · Nabil Rahman · Saba Asad · Saleem Arif · Syed Ashraf · Tariq Islam · Tariq Shazlee · Wakar Khan
No promises recorded yetEntries are added as promises are made, each with a source anyone can check. Statuses follow the promise scale above.
Officials on the record
What ADAMS officials have said in their official roles, grouped by office. Each record gives the exact words, the date, the source, and a score or status.
Right of reply: any official may send a correction or response, which will be shown next to the record it concerns.
The records are listed here when the page's scripts have loaded.
Answers from trustees and staff are added only with a source anyone can check, and scored on the 0–4 answer rubric. Each record includes:
WhenDate, and time stamp for video
WhoName and role at the time
WhereEmail, town hall, Jumu'ah, newsletter
Exact wordsQuoted, never paraphrased
SourceScreenshot, file or recording
ScorePromise status or answer score
Takeaway
The clearest broken commitment is in ADAMS's own words: an audit of 2020 was promised in 2021 and never shown. Every new record added here will be held to the same standard of proof.